Friday, September 24, 2010

IUPUI Fires Women’s Basketball Coach

In a follow up to my July 29 blog on this, IUPUI has fired women’s basketball coach, Shann Hart “without cause.” This means that they do not plan to make public the reasons for the coach’s dismissal. Hart will also receive the balance of her contract through 2013 - $300,000. The allegations against Hart, all of which she denies, included a range of outrageous behavior including snooping into the personal sex lives of her athletes to identify lesbians on her team. The climate of fear resulting from the coach’s behavior was the cause for 29 players and assistant coaches leaving the program over the last four years. After the players’ allegations were made public in July, former players at American University where Hart previously coached also came forward with similar allegations of abuse. Hart has not commented publicly on her dismissal yet.

An important object lesson is lost because IUPUI is not making the results of their investigation and the cause for Hart’s dismissal public and because Hart will still get her salary, which is quite a lot of money. Outrageous behavior by coaches, both men and women, has been tolerated in college and high school athletics for far too long. Psychological and physical abuse of athletes by coaches who lead with fear and intimidation is not acceptable in any context, especially one that is affiliated with an educational institution. We need schools to stand up and be specific about reasons for dismissal when questions of abusive and discriminatory behavior are involved rather than leave the reasons for a coach’s dismissal unknown. Firing a coach accused of abusive behavior “without cause” rather than making the reasons public sends an ambiguous message. What was she fired for then? Why aren’t they making the reasons for her dismissal public?

Open discrimination against women athletes because of their actual or perceived sexual orientation, which is part of the allegations against Hart, has also been tolerated or ignored by school leaders. I had hoped that after the very public lawsuit against Rene Portland at Penn State, that other coaches and administrators would have gotten the message that there are serious consequences to anti-gay discrimination in college athletics. Unfortunately, this situation is a reminder that there are still coaches who believe that fear, abusive treatment and discriminatory practices are acceptable coaching behaviors. I hope they are reading the newspapers today.

Here is a follow-up article on IUPUI's refusal to make public the reason for Hart's dismissal.


Wendy Parker said...

I rarely agree with you on anything, Pat, but this post is spot-on. I'm sure the folks at IUPUI are all lawyered up here, but I still can't believe the audacity of not even attempting to explain anything to a public that's footing the bill for Shann Hart's $300K departing gift.

The best hope for finding out more about what really happened at IUPUI is for the Indianapolis Star to continue its good reporting.

Pat Griffin said...

Thanks for your comment, Wendy. It's nice to agree one time. Take care.

Anonymous said...

Hi Pat, I agree this article sits very poorly with me. I agree with you Pat, outrageous behavior by coaches both men and women has been tolerated in college and h/s to long. Athletic Directors and prez of colleges should be held responsible as well. Im happy that the student athletes from American have come forth to speak out as well. However if these coaches are allowed to leave without cause this type of behavior will continue. Can you imagine the assistant coaches who have worked under these condition, they too will bring the same type of coaching. I believe the NCLR community should go after such coaches when an investigation shows homophia in the athletic ranks. The more cases you have such as Penn State will help wipe this out.

I agree the psychological affects on these student athletes at the hands of these out of control coaches can be devasting. I wish a study would be done, by a professor on how many women abused in college athletics with power ridden coaches can actually get into any type of relationship happily. I'm talking about successful teams as well. This article on IUPUI was interesting . Thank you for posting such cases on your site.

Anonymous said...

A infrequent days ago in Florence, in a case of intellect,[url=][b]gucci 財布[/b][/url]
. major goods rights is initiated whilom,[url=][b]グッチ キーケース [/b][/url]
.the Gucci body, a dwell rejected the Guccio brothers Gucci and Alessandro Gucci, they are Gucci initiator Guccio Gucci's great-grandson. Women's Regularly reported,[url=][b]グッチ 財布[/b][/url]
, Guccio and Alessandro handbags and jewelry callers.[url=][b]グッチ 長財布 [/b][/url]
, ToBeGSrl proper to the inject of "Gucci" and "Guccio Gucci" by way of regard for marketing and website bustle, [url=][b]gucci バッグ[/b][/url]
,charged with proscribed contravention of Gucci's trademark.
The official completely ruled that, after the throw away of the cite "Guccio Gucci", will be on ToBeG products and Gucci's trademark spokeswoman unfair, the gather also thinks, the behavior constituted an unfair competitive behavior, and matrix wishes as follow-up in the disputatious spondulix gush destruction of Gucci adventure, because the blurb materials and Gucci products and commercial activities wonderfully confusing, and not aim nearby way of Gucci descendants formality and reputation.
Guccio Gucci for this subdivision of look brands to manufacturing looking benefit of 12 years, leaving in 1989, and founded ToBeG in 2008 to service his travel,[url=][b]グッチ 長財布 [/b][/url]
.in forefront of manipulation of GiorgioG handbag series.