Here is a news report on the conclusion of a lawsuit I first wrote about in September, 2008. You can see that blog post here for more specific information about the former player's allegations.
The university and coach Rompola will not comment and the university claims it did nothing wrong in this case. The settlement provides the player, Jennifer Colli, with a $19,213 settlement which is the equivalent of one semester of financial aid.
Who knows what really happened here. I guess we can hope that the fact that a player stepped forward to challenge what she perceived as anti-lesbian discrimination by her coach and the failure of the university athletic department to properly investigate her allegations will serve as a warning to other coaches and schools: Athletes and their parents these days are more likely to object to and challenge what they experience as discrimination in sport based on sexual orientation.
Schools and coaches that hope to avoid discrimination lawsuits should educate athletic staff, adopt policy that protects athletes and coaches from discrimination based on sexual orientation and then follow through to make sure these policies are followed by everyone in the athletic department.
The tendency when an athlete charges sexual orientation discrimination against a coach, it seems to me, is for the athletic department to close ranks around the coach rather than conduct an impartial and thorough investigation of the charges. The same seems to hold true for cases in which coaches charge the athletic department with sexual orientation discrimination: The school closes ranks around the AD, as appears to be the case in the Katie Brenny lawsuit currently on-going at the University of Minnesota. It would be a lot less expensive and result in less negative publicity and attention if schools would take a proactive stance on education and policy development related to discrimination based on sexual orientation.
Hat Tip to Women's Hoop Blog for bringing this to my attention.
Nothing I read got to the truth, but the player is $19,000 richer for her troubles. Wonder how much her lawyer gets?
ReplyDeleteInnocent SMU makes a "guilt payment," whatever that is! Maybe SMU will offer a class that explains this.
Does a coach have a right to have a rule, "No dating among players?"
Its a real shame that sexual orientation comes into play with cases like this.
ReplyDeleteOh my god, there's a lot of effective material in this post!
ReplyDeleteThanks for the nice blog. It was very useful for me. I'm happy I found this blog. Thank you for sharing with us,I too always learn something new from your post...
ReplyDeleteIt can't succeed in fact, that's what I believe.
ReplyDeleteYour blog is definitely worth a read if anyone finds it. I'm lucky I did because now I've got a whole new view of this
ReplyDeletevery interesting topic thanks for sharing this important information
ReplyDeleteI really love this post. Its really a great information in this blog. Keep it up.
ReplyDeleteI think that it was less money that she should get but I ain't a lawyer and I don't know much about it.
ReplyDeleteThis content made possible personally to publish my personal essay, the details enclosed here are associated, vendor terminology dealt with appeared to be instant. Let me suggest thisn'te if you need to his personal educator, I believe that she, a little too, can build a new. Because of the writer thinking that unit this branches this fabulous website, this is to my opinion an incredibly extremely versatile as well as fascinating.
ReplyDelete